Public Safety Debate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 1

Public Safety Debate - Essay ExampleIn the novel, The Prince, Machiavelli implies that the state holds all authority. This Machiavellian perspective explicitly argues that all morality, strength and natural rightfulness should be controlled by the rulers of the state, in the interests of bailiwick security and the continuance of the rulers power. In the essay, On Liberty John Stuart Mill suggests that The only purpose for which power can rightfully be exercised oer any member of a civilized community against his entrust is to prevent harm to others (John Stuart Mill in Hart, 19634-5).Could the purpose of law be as simply state as a set of rules to protect society and the individuals within it, and always the safety of the society is much important than that of the individual? In the worlds largest democracy, where human rights principles are constitutionally entrenched, the prioritization of the community over the individual can undoubtedly be seriously questioned. Whether the re is moral justification for a law or a security-related convey for a law, there has to be widespread agreement within a community or society which recognizes that law (Hart, 1994 258). Individuals within a society must recognize, acknowledge the harshness of, and agree to abide by a law.In the debate over whether public safety is more important than civil rights in the United States of America (US), such questions about the nature of the law, the validity of laws, and the need for community security of the population must be addressed. In at least four instances, forming the prat of the thesis of this paper, the conflict between civil rights and laws enacted to promote national security is notable.In the light of popular principles, is it justifiable to remove one persons rights for the presumed greater good? At any presumption time, certain acts may be seen as immoral, or threatening to the greater good.